Obstruction-rundown

[jmkupka]

Irish,
so you're saying it was right to call R2 out? I'm lost.

[youngump]

Originally Posted by jmkupka

Irish,
so you're saying it was right to call R2 out? I'm lost.

No. He's not. To be clear there are two plays going on here (mostly my fault, so let me try and clarify.) As I understand it here's where the discussion stands.

In your play the obstructed runner was put out. Nothing can ever happen after that and placement of the runners is the only question. The rules seem to require you to put the obstructed runner in the correct spot (2b) and then move the other runner back. Irish doesn't like that as it's inconsistent but agrees it is the rule.

In the other play, the obstructed runner is not put out. This leaves R2 standing as a second runner on second base. He can be put out. People's position on this is a little murkier but Irish seems to be saying that R2 wasn't affected by the obstruction so just call R2 out and move on.

[IRISHMAFIA]

All I'm saying is that the trail runner was not affected by the OBS therefore gets no protection if the umpire had determine the proper award for the OBS was 2B

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

All I'm saying is that the trail runner was not affected by the OBS therefore gets no protection if the umpire had determine the proper award for the OBS was 2B

And just to make this a little clearer, I am referring to the scenario where a tag was available after the OBS returned to the base safely

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by jmkupka

Irish,
so you're saying it was right to call R2 out? I'm lost.

More accurately, as often is the case with some, I believe Irish is pointing out that the poster had the right answer but the wrong reason.