The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 02, 2014, 08:07am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
My opinion. Part (3) of the casebook ruling has to be defined as the actual dirt portion of liveball territory. The reason. If you define the diamond as only fair ball territory this could happen. D3K, the defense realizes the ball is by the catcher, so all the infielders sprint outside the foul lines on the field, as does the pitcher. Instead of going to get the ball, the catcher heads toward the dugout. If all the infielders cross the foul lines before the batter-runner reaches first base, under (3) we should call the batter runner out, even if she makes an immediate attempt to get to first.
That's bogus. The rationale behind ruling (3) in the case book is to deal with a situation where the BR essentially abandons her effort to advance. We're not going to stand there and wait while she saunters to the dugout, takes off her helmet, hands it to a teammate, waits for another teammate to bring her her chest protector, shin guards, helmet/mask and mitt, puts on her equipment, etc. etc., and she never enters the dugout.

In fact, I think (2) is even more bogus than (3). Why wait until the time of the next pitch in this scenario, or any other scenario for that matter? I can't envision a situation where an umpire is going to allow for a pitch to be delivered while this BR is still somewhere on the field. Ok, maybe if after she strikes out with less than two outs, she immediately goes to the coach's box and assumes coaching duties, or she goes to the bullpen area that is inside the fences to warm up. But I'm ruling her out well before that for abandonment.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker

Last edited by Manny A; Fri May 02, 2014 at 08:12am.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 02, 2014, 09:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Coach has no basis for complaint. His team did not complete the out. ANY decent catcher knows that if they don't catch the third strike, they have to complete the out. And any decent coach knows the same.

Ball is live - not your fault the defense started leaving the field.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 02, 2014, 10:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Good call, Chapmaja, and good research.

We keep finding editing needs in all the books, unfortunately.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 02, 2014, 08:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
Coach has no basis for complaint. His team did not complete the out. ANY decent catcher knows that if they don't catch the third strike, they have to complete the out. And any decent coach knows the same.

Ball is live - not your fault the defense started leaving the field.
Does anyone know what the college rule is on this? The reason I ask is the coach in question was a 4 year starter for a major DI softball program and played in the WCWS as a player. I think she may have felt the rule was the same as college. Is the rule different.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 05, 2014, 02:20pm
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
Does anyone know what the college rule is on this? The reason I ask is the coach in question was a 4 year starter for a major DI softball program and played in the WCWS as a player. I think she may have felt the rule was the same as college. Is the rule different.
The college rule says simply that the BR is out if she leaves the field of play on the uncaught third strike. There are no case plays that mention the BR cannot advance after the next pitch or after the defense leaves fair territory.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dropped third strike question andyump Softball 17 Mon May 23, 2011 05:59pm
Dropped 3rd strike question FTVMartin Baseball 4 Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:16pm
dropped 3rd strike question scroobs Softball 5 Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:38am
Dropped third strike question okmitzi Baseball 14 Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:39pm
Dropped Third Strike Question starman Baseball 16 Fri Aug 05, 2005 01:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1