![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Your interpretation is wrong.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
|
Quote:
There's only one thing different concerning an IFF compared to other fly balls, and that's that the batter is out regardless if the ball is caught. Otherwise, it's a fly ball. No need for runners to tag up if the ball is dropped. Trust me, you're hearing from umpires who have done this for many years. Give up the argument.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Point #2. Doesn't make any difference, to the best of my knowledgethe rule and it's application is universal. Point #3. The portion in RED is reliant upon the first half of the sentence prior to the comma, the ball being caught. Point #4. Again, ttbomk, in all cases, the IF ruling affects only two portions of the rules: a) it declares the batter-runner out, and b) instructs participants & umpires alike to ignore the Intentionally Dropped Ball rule. No other rule or the application of the rule is affected by an IF call.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Infield Fly Rule | rbmartin | Baseball | 30 | Fri Apr 27, 2012 04:04pm |
| Infield Fly Rule | UES-2 | Baseball | 11 | Sun Jul 04, 2010 01:10am |
| Infield Fly Rule | mccann | Softball | 1 | Sat Apr 01, 2006 06:31pm |
| Infield Fly Rule | Bandit | Softball | 13 | Mon Dec 15, 2003 01:55pm |
| Infield Fly Rule | paparada | Softball | 5 | Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:44am |