![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Speaking of playing short handed, at nationals this year had a team that for whatever reason was playing all their pool games short a player. In all 3 of his games he pitched a fit that the missing batter was no different than a batting out of order and had to be caught by the defense and appealed before the next pitch.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
Thats exactly what I did. I had watched him argue it in his 1st game so I knew what was coming. In the pregame I noted the missing batter and explained to him it would be an automatic out. He tried to argue it then but I shut him down and explained it is not an appeal situation, the rule book specifically states when playing short handed the missing batter is an automatic out. I noted the batters number listed last and every time I saw her at bat I would ring up another out after her.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
Unbelieveable. I guess it would have been the tournament's fault if a player was injured and they had to forfeit their games.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CDP Week 5 | seioaump | Baseball | 0 | Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:31am |
| What a week | blindzebra | Basketball | 8 | Mon Dec 20, 2004 02:47pm |
| NFL week 3 | sportFD | Football | 2 | Sat Sep 25, 2004 07:50pm |
| Interp of the Week - Week #2 | Jim Porter | Baseball | 17 | Wed Mar 07, 2001 02:45pm |