Decent question from softball dot com.

[BretMan]

I'd say that you have a runner hit by a batted ball and you need to apply all the usual rules that apply to such a runner.

Was the ball fair when touched?

Was the runner in contact with the base when the ball was touched?

[BuggBob]

Dead Ball, Runner out for interferance, Batter awarded 1st, other runners advace if forced.

[MD Longhorn]

I gave all the info they gave, but I think we should assume that yes - the ball was in fair territory. If you answer depends on whether the runner touched the base before the ball hit her, or vice versa, please state so.

[NCASAUmp]

Sounds familiar...

[MrRabbit]

Since the defense gave up their opportunity to field the ball I have nothing, live ball.

[roadking]

Originally Posted by MrRabbit

Since the defense gave up their opportunity to field the ball I have nothing, live ball.

Ditto, unless you judge runner intensional made contact with the ball.

[BuggBob]

Originally Posted by MrRabbit

Since the defense gave up their opportunity to field the ball I have nothing, live ball.

I disagree, the rule state fielder fielding a batted ball. I don't have to rule on fielder's ability, only if the runner interfered (intentional or not) with the fielder's opportunity to field the ball.

[tcannizzo]

+1
If fair, F5 must be given any opportunity to field the batted ball and make a play.

OP doesn't have enough info to provide a single answer.
Otherwise we will be twirling multiple scenarios in the world of "what if".