![]() |
|
|
|||
Mechanics review
Just to refine and clarify mechanics as written, not to debate the merits of any instruction or one book versus the other.
Main interest NFHS/ASA, but add NCAA if you like. Are these really taboos? - calling OBS at a base by the PU - calling OBS at HP by the BU - BU calling infield fly - BU signaling but not calling infield fly - PU making a call at 3rd from slightly in foul ground - Same, runner returning after rounding Multiple runners, lead runner to 3rd, no play at home: - second play; PU or not - first play after possible play at 1st not made; PU or not
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. Last edited by CecilOne; Wed Apr 04, 2012 at 10:30am. |
|
|||
Quote:
ASA: Are these really taboos? - calling OBS at a base by the PU - NO - calling OBS at HP by the BU - YES - BU calling infield fly - YES - BU signaling but not calling infield fly - NO - PU making a call at 3rd from slightly in foul ground - Depends on the call in question and the situation - Same, runner returning after rounding - ditto Multiple runners, lead runner to 3rd, no play at home: - second play; PU or not - I pregame this, every game. - first play after possible play at 1st not made; PU or not - First play is BU's (assuming 1st play not at plate)
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Please expand on those above.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
How do you handle this?
B slot, runner goes to 2nd on passed ball. Do you continue to C immediately or stay at 2nd and actually wait for ball back to pitcher?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
I know it's not standard, but I'm seeing it more lately --- I rim the infield on this play, getting to the SS side of the bag ahead of the runner (but not all the way to C yet), watching ball, pitcher primarily and watching for the touch of 2nd and/or obstruction by glancing over.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Stay with the runner by rounding the base. If there is going to be a play there, this will give you the perfect view of the front edge of the base.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
The second one, I ALWAYS include in the pregame that I, as PU, will cover the 2nd play at 3rd if BU is taken to 1st for the 1st play. As BU, I describe the scenario to partner and get his input (sometimes they do it, sometimes they don't like it and expect BU to take both calls). It may not be ASA standard, but it's at least 50/50 here, so I want to make sure I'm on the same page as partner.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
How about this? BU in A when batter walks.
Why is there an objection to the BU moving off the line into the infield before the BR gets to 1st? Or, is there really a taught objection (as "honor the runner")? It seems to me moving off the line is better prep for an advance/attempt to 2nd. If this is an item, is it an NCAA thing?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
With R1 on 2nd, and U3 in B, U1 should still hold until all play has ended; standard rotaion has PU covering 3rd, U3 holding at 2nd, U1 holding at 1st with possible rotation to cover home. With R1 on 3rd, U1 DOES have BR to 2nd, and must be prepared for that play. Then, and only then, is U1 to consider moving further off the line to prepare for that possible (1st and 3rd) play. In the two umpire system, BU always has BR to 2nd; and should react accordingly,same as R1 on 3rd in 3 umpire system. Staying fully on the line in the two umpires system doesn't follow the NCAA guideline to prepare for the next possible play until each play has ended. It can only stem from those confusing 3 umpire mechanics with 2 umpire mechanics.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
That makes sense ... knowing the guy who does that in our league, he probably either saw it on TV during an NCAA game and decided, "well, that's what they do in college, so that's what I should do", or someone else was describing the mechanic in NCAA and he decided to "big-time" it and adopt the mechanic.
Wouldn't be the first time...
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
The ball is dead on the HBP - no need to stay on the line in 2 umpire mechanics.
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Upon further review...... | BK47 | Baseball | 13 | Fri Oct 08, 2010 04:04pm |
NCAA Review Mechanics | Mark Dexter | Football | 1 | Fri Oct 12, 2007 06:42am |
After further review: NFL | Old School | Football | 13 | Wed Sep 26, 2007 09:49pm |
My 1st Review | Alameda | Softball | 13 | Thu Aug 04, 2005 02:43pm |
AP review for all! | williebfree | Basketball | 9 | Fri Feb 14, 2003 04:31pm |