![]() |
|
|||
|
Re: Hot topic..
Quote:
Last year, ASA proved they were serious when they banned a group of bats that did not meet specs even though the offered prototype won certification through testing. Then, another group a month later at the head of National Championship play. USSSA has lived with the 1.20 BPF these years and have outlawed a number of bats though I'm not familiar with their testing. NFHS is the only organization to adopt the ASA original scheme and stick with it. NCAA basically follows ASA's guidelines. Last July, ASA passed emergency legislation mandating a change in ball's COR and compression in SP so that the manufacturers would have time to get them into production for play this year. Next year, FP/MP join in the ball change. The players are just as guilty as the manufacturers in this issue. They know the risks and many make up a bundle of excuses to justify their use of such equipment. The manufacturers are the ones who are gouging the players. For once, the sanctioning bodies have been the level-headed ones in what many consider a crisis situation. BTW, ASA has a conference happening this week which may result in the further banning of bats, most likely those of a composite structure.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|