The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 11, 2011, 12:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcannizzo View Post
Any explanation as to why 43ft for 14-U was not approved?
Because it wasn't proposed?
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 11, 2011, 01:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Seems that if the Chinese had a softball calendar, this was the year of the Slow Pitch.

There are 11 changes that Irish listed below, and 6 of those 11 are changes for SP only. The remaining 5 changes affect all levels of softball. Not a single FP-specific change.

I know a lot of players who will be happy with these changes. As a primarily SP umpire, I'm glad to see a bit of focus devoted to SP this year. The program has had some difficulties as of late, and I think these changes are all positive ones for the program.
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 14, 2011, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
In looking through the proposed rule changes, I noticed a peculiar change in the wording. On #9 (changing the safety tape to safety "grip" and reducing it to 6"), I noticed that it says that "resin, pine tar or spray substances are permissible on the Safety Grip region only."

Was this the wording that was approved? If so, would that be to say that players can spray their bats up to 15" from the safety knob, even if their grip only extends 6" from the knob?
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 16, 2011, 09:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Guess we'll have to wait and see.
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2011, 12:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
So what's this one???


"Allows the BR to advance beyond 1B only if there is a play made on another runner or there is an errant throw."
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2011, 01:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
So what's this one???

"Allows the BR to advance beyond 1B only if there is a play made on another runner or there is an errant throw."
Slow Pitch with stealing, not allowing a walked batter to continue to 2nd unless a play is made by the defense. Standard double jeopardy play in fastpitch, not intended to be part of the slowpitch game when stealing was introduced to that game.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 17, 2011, 08:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post
Slow Pitch with stealing, not allowing a walked batter to continue to 2nd unless a play is made by the defense. Standard double jeopardy play in fastpitch, not intended to be part of the slowpitch game when stealing was introduced to that game.
While I assumed this was a slow pitch only change, the OP did not state such.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASA Non-Approved Softballs NCASAUmp Softball 0 Tue May 03, 2011 01:53pm
ASA Approved Bats? bigsig Softball 4 Mon Feb 07, 2011 07:13am
ASA Illegal/Non-approved bat approved by umpire NCASAUmp Softball 18 Tue Oct 13, 2009 01:51pm
approved bats justmom Softball 13 Tue Apr 25, 2006 08:35pm
Non ASA Approved Bats Dukat Softball 0 Tue Jun 01, 2004 03:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1