|
Wed Aug 31, 2011, 02:29pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I completely agree.
We certainly don't want to leave outs on the table, if they are actually there. However, we don't want to reward the defense by giving them an out they weren't entitled to having. Understanding the definition of a play is imperative when making this decision. Definitely the benefit of the doubt must go to the defense if a reasonable chance that a play could have been made.
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Interference Question | FullCount | Softball | 10 | Thu Apr 22, 2010 06:15pm |
| Interference question | FTVMartin | Baseball | 10 | Wed Aug 01, 2007 04:59pm |
| interference question | MJT | Softball | 29 | Tue Jun 05, 2007 03:32pm |
| Interference question | bluduc | Baseball | 2 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:23pm |
| Interference Question | Stair-Climber | Softball | 9 | Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:12am |
Threaded Mode
