|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
Because the odds of getting a double play in that case would be if the BR fails to or delays his/her advancement to 1B. The runners need to stay on or near the base or be subject to being doubled off. That possibility does not exist with the BR.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
It's sorta covered w/ the intentionally dropped fly ball in the infield. Not 100% as an infielder can guide the ball to the ground [ASA].
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball |
|
|||
To paraphrase what others have said:
The IFF rule is intended to protect the offense from a cheap double play due to runners that must stay at their base because the ball is obviously in flight and they would be doubled off if they run. With two or more such runners, it would be a fairly easy task by most players. But nothing keeps that batter-runner from running, other than laziness or stupidity; there is certainly no jeopardy attached to the batter-runner running, like there is for the other runners. There is no reason to protect that person if he/she fails to run out their hit.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
If
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This past weekend in Vegas | tomegun | Basketball | 68 | Mon Aug 09, 2010 05:19pm |
3 college issues from this past weekend | PSU213 | Football | 28 | Mon Sep 08, 2008 08:21pm |
Situation this past weekend - Do over | grizwald | Basketball | 21 | Thu Jun 08, 2006 04:06am |
Any you guys down south see the Grey Cup this past weekend? | HossHumard | Football | 22 | Sun Dec 04, 2005 07:57pm |