The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 09:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
NCAA OBS penalty

In NCAA, there is a rule that an OBS by the same player after a rounding/returning warning results in an automatic base award. If read literally, it says nothing about where the runner ended up on her own.

Case: after a warning, F3 obstructs R1 rounding 1st.
(A) R1 stops, goes back to 1st.
(B) R1 makes it to 2nd on her own.

In (A), R1 is awarded 2nd, but what about (B)?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 09:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
In NCAA, there is a rule that an OBS by the same player after a rounding/returning warning results in an automatic base award. If read literally, it says nothing about where the runner ended up on her own.

Case: after a warning, F3 obstructs R1 rounding 1st.
(A) R1 stops, goes back to 1st.
(B) R1 makes it to 2nd on her own.

In (A), R1 is awarded 2nd, but what about (B)?
You should never take "where the runner ended up on her own" into account (I believe this to be true in all rulesets).

And why are you mentioning a warning? That's not in any ruleset either (other than possible local yokel rules).

I believe (assuming you're really CecilOne and not a hacker) that you already know this. But A) is not correct either. It's not an automatic award.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Central, FL
Posts: 1,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post

(Snip)
And why are you mentioning a warning? That's not in any ruleset either (other than possible local yokel rules).
(Snip)


Who are you calling a yokel????

NCAA 9.4.2.4 Effect:
"Delayed-dead ball is signalled. The umpire shall issue a warning to the offending individual and notify her coach......."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
You should never take "where the runner ended up on her own" into account (I believe this to be true in all rulesets).

And why are you mentioning a warning? That's not in any ruleset either (other than possible local yokel rules).

I believe (assuming you're really CecilOne and not a hacker) that you already know this. But A) is not correct either. It's not an automatic award.
You've stepped in it now "Big Time". Just be sure you clean your foot off before you put it back in your mouth.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
OK, OK... I was wrong on the warning. Flat wrong and egregiously wrong.

But let me be the first to say, "That's freaking insane." Why would every team not intentionally obstruct the first girl that hits an apparent double (or more)?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
In NCAA, there is a rule that an OBS by the same player after a rounding/returning warning results in an automatic base award. If read literally, it says nothing about where the runner ended up on her own.

Case: after a warning, F3 obstructs R1 rounding 1st.
(A) R1 stops, goes back to 1st.
(B) R1 makes it to 2nd on her own.

In (A), R1 is awarded 2nd, but what about (B)?
9.4.2.4 EFFECT - ...The awards shall be to the base beyond the base she would have reached had obstruction not occurred unless the runners safely advance further on their own, in which case no award is given.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
OK, OK... I was wrong on the warning. Flat wrong and egregiously wrong.

But let me be the first to say, "That's freaking insane." Why would every team not intentionally obstruct the first girl that hits an apparent double (or more)?
I don't do NCAA either, but from my casual understanding of the rule, obstruction is penalized much the same as in ASA/NFHS except that when you obstruct on rounding and returning you ALSO get a warning. If you do it again you get ejected. (And possibly from the OP you also get an extra base?)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
OK, OK... I was wrong on the warning. Flat wrong and egregiously wrong.

But let me be the first to say, "That's freaking insane." Why would every team not intentionally obstruct the first girl that hits an apparent double (or more)?
Being wrong is one thing. Being arrogantly ignorant is another.

The effect quoted above answers your question for you "BT".
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
Being wrong is one thing. Being arrogantly ignorant is another....
Yeah... it's called being a coach!
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 10:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
Being wrong is one thing. Being arrogantly ignorant is another.
I believe I ate my crow... this was unnecessary. I admit to ignorant. I don't believe I was being arrogant, although my hacker comment which came from the proliferation of fake posts in recent days might be construed that way. If it did, I'll apologize for that as well.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
In NCAA, there is a rule that an OBS by the same player after a rounding/returning warning results in an automatic base award. If read literally, it says nothing about where the runner ended up on her own.

Case: after a warning, F3 obstructs R1 rounding 1st.
(A) R1 stops, goes back to 1st.
(B) R1 makes it to 2nd on her own.

In (A), R1 is awarded 2nd, but what about (B)?
To answer all:

One first occurrence by a player; treat the same as obstruction in ASA/NFHS, give an official warning (PU recording player number) announced to offending head coach.

One first occurence by ANOTHER player; treat the same as obstruction in ASA/NFHS, give an official warning (PU recording new player number) announced to offending head coach.

On a second (or more) occurrence by any previously warned player; treat the same as obstruction in ASA/NFHS. At the end of the play, award obstructed runner one additional base beyond the base you would have awarded (but not any additional if runner has already overrun protection).

Result of this rule: There is almost NEVER obstruction of this type in NCAA, I can't remember the last time I ever had to even give a warning!! Of course, it "accidentally" happens ALL THE TIME is ASA and NFHS.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 01:24pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Thanks Steve - this is less "freaking insane" than I was led to believe. I inferred (obviously incorrectly) that the "warning" was like other warnings in the book - no penalty on 1st offense, don't do it again. Knowing now that there is the "normal" penalty in ADDITION to a warning, I retract "freaking insane" and again apologize.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 02:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Thanks Steve - this is less "freaking insane" than I was led to believe. I inferred (obviously incorrectly) that the "warning" was like other warnings in the book - no penalty on 1st offense, don't do it again. Knowing now that there is the "normal" penalty in ADDITION to a warning, I retract "freaking insane" and again apologize.
No need to keep apologizing. There will always be those looking to pounce for a cheap shot, apology or not.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 03:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
No need to keep apologizing. There will always be those looking to pounce for a cheap shot, apology or not.
Sorry!

__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 06, 2011, 04:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
sorry!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA considers changing IP penalty KJUmp Softball 21 Wed Sep 01, 2010 07:23am
Hypothetical NCAA OT penalty situation bearclause Football 6 Thu Oct 26, 2006 04:27pm
NCAA PI Penalty Spot floray Football 15 Thu Sep 08, 2005 07:33pm
(NCAA) Penalty for Offensive Pass Interference Ed Hickland Football 3 Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:49am
TECHNICAL PENALTY NCAA rburn22281 Basketball 1 Mon Jan 28, 2002 12:22am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1