The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 29, 2010, 07:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 870
The idea about dumbing down the mechanics catering to unathletic umpires is a question worth bringing into this discussion.

In a perfect world, (which my mentors constantly remind me that it is not), all umpires would be physically and mentally able to perform their duties with the current mechanics. Unfortunatley, this is not the case in our area as we have a severe shortage of umpires of any calibre, that we have to pretty much take anyone who is willing to get on the field.

There are a number of umpires in my association who legitimatley qualify as physically handicapped. They are "good umpires", but the first few times I worked with them, it was very, very frustrating. I labeled them as plain lazy, and even put a Partner Block on the Arbiter on one of them.

One guy took so much time getting across the field after a play at 3B required him to get back to A, that I actually let the pitcher start the pitch when he was still passing through B. Honestly, I held the pitcher up as long as I could. The runner was out at 3B; defense got set, pitcher had ball ready to pitch, batter is in box, and BU was moving at a speed greatly less than 1 mph. BTW this was in the 1st inning of the 1st game of the day! He never left A to make the calls at 1B.

I even asked him if he was OK, and he said he was fine. After realizng that it was physical, not mental, my attitude switched from anger to sympathy.

I am not in in favor of dumbing down the mechanics to cater to the lowest common denominator. That being said, this (and other sitches) took away from the game. Until such time as we can have a sufficiently large talent pool to support a competitive umpring environment, with a weeding out process for the lower rated umpires, we might actually be forced to consider alternative mechanics.
__________________
Tony
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 30, 2010, 12:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcannizzo View Post
The idea about dumbing down the mechanics catering to unathletic umpires is a question worth bringing into this discussion.

In a perfect world, (which my mentors constantly remind me that it is not), all umpires would be physically and mentally able to perform their duties with the current mechanics. Unfortunatley, this is not the case in our area as we have a severe shortage of umpires of any calibre, that we have to pretty much take anyone who is willing to get on the field.

There are a number of umpires in my association who legitimatley qualify as physically handicapped. They are "good umpires", but the first few times I worked with them, it was very, very frustrating. I labeled them as plain lazy, and even put a Partner Block on the Arbiter on one of them.

One guy took so much time getting across the field after a play at 3B required him to get back to A, that I actually let the pitcher start the pitch when he was still passing through B. Honestly, I held the pitcher up as long as I could. The runner was out at 3B; defense got set, pitcher had ball ready to pitch, batter is in box, and BU was moving at a speed greatly less than 1 mph. BTW this was in the 1st inning of the 1st game of the day! He never left A to make the calls at 1B.

I even asked him if he was OK, and he said he was fine. After realizng that it was physical, not mental, my attitude switched from anger to sympathy.

I am not in in favor of dumbing down the mechanics to cater to the lowest common denominator. That being said, this (and other sitches) took away from the game. Until such time as we can have a sufficiently large talent pool to support a competitive umpring environment, with a weeding out process for the lower rated umpires, we might actually be forced to consider alternative mechanics.
I cannot disagree with anything Tony has stated here.

Yes, that cracking was the ice of hell freezing over.

The only problem is that while it is a concern, the teams are still paying the money for a specific service. Like it or not, this is a fact of life and as a consumer, if I do not receive the service, and I expect the best, for which I am paying, I'm not going to be happy.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 30, 2010, 10:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcannizzo View Post
The idea about dumbing down the mechanics catering to unathletic umpires is a question worth bringing into this discussion.

... snip ...

I am not in in favor of dumbing down the mechanics to cater to the lowest common denominator. That being said, this (and other sitches) took away from the game. Until such time as we can have a sufficiently large talent pool to support a competitive umpring environment, with a weeding out process for the lower rated umpires, we might actually be forced to consider alternative mechanics.
While we have to cater to the less mobile and possibly vary the coverage for a specific game, the defined and taught mechanics should always be based on the best coverage, best results over time; not "dumbed down". That would also encourage those who need it to work on conditioning and preparation.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3-5-2c discussion constable Basketball 70 Thu Oct 14, 2010 04:38am
Abramson Discussion HugoTafurst Softball 7 Sun Jun 06, 2010 08:06am
Spin off of our OBS/INT discussion. TussAgee11 Baseball 15 Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:28pm
For discussion sake... CLH Basketball 39 Tue Dec 04, 2007 07:27pm
fuel for discussion scyguy Baseball 93 Sat Sep 18, 2004 09:52am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1