Interference - Is intent Required?

#25 (permalink)

Sun Aug 22, 2010, 02:25pm

IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Sep 2000

Location: USA

Posts: 14,565

Quote:

Originally Posted by BretMan

So I don't really get "there was interference on the play, but it wasn't intentional" as a good explanation of the call. What this would really have to mean would be "there was contact on the play, but it was not interference".

Agree. If it is INT, someone should be ruled out. If no one is ruled out, it may have been contact, intentional or unintentional, it may have been confusing, it may or may not have been fair, but it cannot be INT.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Is a Re-Touch Required?	cshs81	Baseball	13	Sun Apr 13, 2008 01:35pm
When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent	wadeintothem	Softball	48	Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:58am
No "Intent" in interference	DaveASA/FED	Softball	14	Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:07pm
NCAA Pass Interference - Intent required?	mwingram	Football	2	Sat Nov 09, 2002 12:54pm
Intent/Letter of the law: Interference	Patrick Szalapski	Baseball	1	Sat Mar 17, 2001 07:20pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10am.