The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 06:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
The following are the rule changes that will be presented to the General Council tomorrow as approved:

Change 16U & 18U FP to 43' pitching distance

Change base distance for Men's Adult SP (excluding Seniors) to 70'

Permit the Safety Base to be any color contrasting with white

Clarified a legal bat which includes a flare/cone at the knob end of the handle

Allow JO 16U & 18U FP to wear metal spikes

Eliminated "heating" from the Note restricting the changing of the characteristics of equipment

Change the rule to return all runners to their previous base ANYTIME the BR is determined to be an Unreported Substitute prior to the next pitch.

Change 4.7.C.5 from banning "communication equipment" to "electronic equipment" from the dugout. This includes video cameras.

Include "Modified" in the rule allowing the pitcher to use a drying agent

Allowed Modified to use a courtesy runner for the pitcher and catcher similar to that of the FP game.

The following are some of the proposed changes rejected, but may be resurrected on during General Council:

Changing the pitching distance to 53' for all adult SP except Seniors

Changing the base distance to 70' for all adult SP except Seniors and Masters

Changing the pitch height in SP to 6-10 feet

Allowing a courtesy foul in SP when the batter starts with a 1-1 count
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 06:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Without any disagreement with Mike, here is what I posted on my local messageboard:

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve
The one Code item everyone is focused on regards college players playing in youth. The current status is the one remaining proposal would ban them only from Gold, and it includes even club team players, as well as JUCO, etc. That one passed Legislative with a slim split vote, and will surely be debated again tomorrow at the General Council. Because it passed at the Committee, it will take a 60% majority to overturn the passage (an interesting turn, in that it now means that 40% + 1 is a majority???). Several Code proposals to move the Gold National around the country have passed.

The same situation exists regarding metal cleats; now passed the Rules Committee by a slim majority for all 16U and 18U levels. Pitching changes for all 18U and 16U levels to 43' appears well in hand; 14U just isn't going to happen this year. Proposals to mandate face guards have failed miserably; as have proposals to disqualify catchers (and/or the head coach) if they are observed warming up pitchers without masks. A proposal to allow EP's also failed badly, as well as allowing on deck batters to either side. Efforts to match the high school and college requirement to draw the bat back on a bunt also appears doomed. One proposal to ban any electronic equipment not used solely for scorekeeping appears like it will pass (someone used video cameras and playback in the dugout).

When I say failed badly, there were unanimous subcommittee rejections, and the Rules Committee could not muster a motion and second to even vote with almost 50 voting members present. Those items with split votes will almost assuredly be rebattled by the General Council.

For those interested in adult slow pitch, there were split votes on 1) moving adult bases to 70' to give infielders more time to make a play (approved), 2) dropping the arc from 12' to 10' to match other associations (failed), and adding a courtesy foul (failed).
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Sounds pretty good. Interesting is all the hubbub at the 18Gs about the grip attachements only to (probably) have it changed this year.

Good to see the cleat changes.

I think the pitching distance change is what parents/coaches think they want not realizing how badly most of their pitchers struggle even at 40'. I think they think their pitchers are better than they are. This change will help the top pitchers and hurt the vast majority of mediocre pitchers.. but if its what they want, oh well.

I experienced it several times last weekend with teams playing up to 18's expecting me to adjust my zone so their mediocre pitchers could get a strike.

Banning electrical equipment sounds like an unnecessary PITA.

I guess no news on whether the 18gs will be moving around?
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem View Post
I guess no news on whether the 18gs will be moving around?
Actually, 3 different proposals, I believe 2 of 3 may have passed.

One has it always being voted on and awarded like every other tournament. Second has it on OKC every 3rd year, with the Executive Director placing it in the off years.

The one I believe failed had it in OKC every 5th year, with the other 4 voted on and awarded.

Pretty sure one of the two will be the final outcome; surprising to me, #2 seems the favorite. Will be fought, as some want the membership to make all such decisions, and not give up any opportunities.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 11, 2009, 07:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem View Post

I guess no news on whether the 18gs will be moving around?
Actually, Steve addressed that.

The change was to allow the Executive Director designate the location.

At the time, I was sitting with a particular ASA member whom I believe has an inside track. One of the Past Presidents jokingly mentioned "trusting" RR to place the tournament around the country, including the possibility of Altoona, PA.

I turned to this individual and said, "I see it more like a rotation of Anaheim, OKC & Orlando".
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 10:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Actually, Steve addressed that.

The change was to allow the Executive Director designate the location.

At the time, I was sitting with a particular ASA member whom I believe has an inside track. One of the Past Presidents jokingly mentioned "trusting" RR to place the tournament around the country, including the possibility of Altoona, PA.

I turned to this individual and said, "I see it more like a rotation of Anaheim, OKC & Orlando".
He could throw Georgia a bone. If it wasnt for their weather, that place aint half bad.

As long as we dont have to go to Texas, least of all Midland.. its all good though.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Permit the Safety Base to be any color contrasting with white
How about also contrasting with the ground? Any color includes tan, brown, faded orange, etc.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
How about also contrasting with the ground?
Well, that would throw out Orange bases here, with our clay.
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 01:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
The following are the rule changes that have been approved:

Change 16U & 18U FP to 43' pitching distance

Permit the Safety Base to be any color contrasting with white

Clarified a legal bat which includes a flare/cone at the knob end of the handle

Allow JO 16U & 18U FP to wear metal spikes

Eliminate "heating" from the Note restricting the changing of the characteristics of equipment

Change the rule to return all runners to their previous base ANYTIME the BR is determined to be an Unreported Substitute prior to the next pitch.

Change 4.7.C.5 from banning "communication equipment" to "electronic equipment" from the dugout. This includes video cameras.

Change SP & 16" SP pitch height to 10' (passed by council, 162-58)

Include "Modified" in the rule allowing the pitcher to use a drying agent

Allowed Modified to use a courtesy runner for the pitcher and catcher similar to that of the FP game.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.

Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Thu Nov 12, 2009 at 01:18pm.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
So those are completely done deals? All of those will appear in the 2010 book?
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 01:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
So those are completely done deals? All of those will appear in the 2010 book?

Yep
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Thanks for the update. Looks good!
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 01:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Change SP & 16" SP pitch height to 10' (passed by council, 162-58)
This one surprises me. Why did they lower the max height? To be more consistent with other orgs? Or to get greater consistency among umpires?
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 02:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
This one surprises me. Why did they lower the max height? To be more consistent with other orgs? Or to get greater consistency among umpires?
The SP Task Force really wanted this. Some RPL players supported this as they contend it is easier to change bats than adjust timing. It was presented as something the players prefer and would possible draw teams back to ASA.

This was one of four changes for which the task force seriously lobbied and I believe it was the only one they got sold.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 12, 2009, 06:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Kinda wish ASA would have stood firm on allowing college players in the Gold.. but I guess that had to go.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposed NCAA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 14 Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:13am
Proposed ASA Rule Changes #1 IRISHMAFIA Softball 107 Thu Nov 06, 2008 02:14am
Proposed Rule Changes, ASA? IRISHMAFIA Softball 47 Fri Sep 07, 2007 01:36pm
Proposed ASA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 8 Mon Oct 11, 2004 07:09pm
Proposed Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 22 Wed Oct 06, 2004 02:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1