Mob at home plate?

[ronald]

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp

Fellas, fellas... Don't make me start ejecting people...

Dave you are ejected.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by ronald

How do you guys split the shaded boxes when you reply to someone? Thanks

Surround each statement you want to quote with the quote tags.

For example:

PHP Code:

[quote]How do you guys split the shaded boxes when you reply to someone?  Thanks[/QUOTE]

[quote]Surround each statement you want to quote with the quote tags.[/quote] 


The above block of text will give you:

How do you guys split the shaded boxes when you reply to someone? Thanks

Surround each statement you want to quote with quote tags.

[ronald]

Thanks, Welpe.

Ron

[Welpe]

No problem! I slightly edited my post, if that helps you any.

[NCASAUmp]

Originally Posted by ronald

Dave you are ejected.

Oh noes! I wuz ejectid!

I can haz forfit?

[Welpe]

Looking at the other issues in this video, what do you do (if anything) with the two base coaches and what looks to be half the dugout surrounding the plate?

[argodad]

Originally Posted by Welpe

Looking at the other issues in this video, what do you do (if anything) with the two base coaches and what looks to be half the dugout surrounding the plate?

I don't mind them being excited on an important score. As long as all players had helmets on, I'm not penalizing ... BUT I'm sure going to be alert for them to cause INT!

[ronald]

I got this from the Fed Interpreter for MA.

Ron:

I can't tell from the video exactly where the ball was when the runner clobbered the catcher.

If the catcher actually had the ball, the catcher is not guilty of obstruction but the runner is guilty of a malicious collision. She is out and should be ejected.

If the catcher did not have possession of the ball, the catcher is guilty of obstruction. However, when malicious contact occurs, it supersedes the obstruction and the runner is out and should be ejected.

How did you see it?

That I have already stated.

[SethPDX]

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp

I encourage it in football and hockey, though.

I like a good hockey game too, but the No Hitting League wants to protect its players...

[topper]

Originally Posted by ronald

I got this from the Fed Interpreter for MA.

Now you've switched states on me. I thought Maryland's Fed Judgment Interpreter was the man to see. Now you say Massachusetts. Do I need to book an additional flight or are they within reasonable driving distance of each other? Or, are they the same person? Please advise.

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by topper

Now you've switched states on me. I thought Maryland's Fed Judgment Interpreter was the man to see. Now you say Massachusetts. Do I need to book an additional flight or are they within reasonable driving distance of each other? Or, are they the same person? Please advise.

He's near DC and you know in that area, the only "truth" is whatever is needed to fit at the time.

I'm sure Ron meant MD. But then again, you just never know.....

[azbigdawg]

surprised to see this play still being discussed....

[ronald]

Yup, I meant MD. When I typed, I took a double take but kept it. Thought it was Maryland. Been a few years since I had to write MD.

[NCASAUmp]

Originally Posted by azbigdawg

surprised to see this play still being discussed....

I think it raised a bunch of emotions to see some poor high school girl getting plowed into without any repercussions.

[azbigdawg]

Originally Posted by NCASAUmp

I think it raised a bunch of emotions to see some poor high school girl getting plowed into without any repercussions.

It WAS a surprising play. I would LOVE to know what the PU was (or wasnt) thinking......