The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 11, 2009, 09:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp View Post
I don't drink THAT often, and I quit smoking!

Oh, I still haven't had a smoke since Jan 1, btw. Woohoo!

Back to the subject at hand, will they have the PDF version available this year? It's not on officialgear.com...
Hey, keep it up! Good for you.

I quit April 1st so I'm coming up on my 1 yr. Youre way over the hump bro, but I can tell you even 10 months later I occasionally still want one.

Throw that yoke off. Just move on accepting you will still want one. I dont know when that goes away, prolly different for every one.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 11, 2009, 09:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
I must be missing your point because I don't see the contradiction.
I don't have my 2009 book yet, so I'm relying on the quote Bretman posted above, and contrasting it with the 2007 book (which I have as a PDF). Sentences in the two quotes of the same color are directly contradictory. The saving grace is very few people will actually read the SAG.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BretMan View Post
(Page 168- Safety Awareness Guide) Catcher Masks and Throat Protectors for Juniour Olympic Fast Pitch: Catcher's must wear an approved batter's helmet with ear flaps, the catcher's helmet and mask, or an approved plastic face mask/guard with catcher's helmet. A throat protector for Junior Olympic fast pitch catchers is mandatory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASA 2007 Rules
C. CATCHER MASKS: (Junior Olympic Fast Pitch) Catchers must wear a mask with throat protector, approved helmet with ear flaps, shin guards which offer protection to the knee caps and body protector. An extended wire protector may be worn in lieu of an attached throat protector. Any player warming up a Junior Olympic pitcher must wear a mask with throat protector and approved helmet with ear flaps. FP catchers cannot wear the plastic face mask/guard.
NOTE: (Sections A-B-C) The ice hockey goalie style face mask is approved for use by catchers. If the umpire feels that there is not adequate throat protection built onto the mask, a throat attachment must be added to the mask before using.

D. FACE MASK/GUARDS. Any defensive player or offensive player may wear a face mask/guard.
EXCEPTION: Fast pitch catchers cannot wear the plastic face mask/guard. Face masks/guards that are cracked or deformed, or if padding has deteriorated or is missing, are prohibited.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 11, 2009, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
I disagree.

Both sentences clearly indicate that a plastic face mask worn by a catcher must be approved.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 11, 2009, 11:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Sentences in the two quotes of the same color are directly contradictory.
At least my point wasn't so vague that nobody got it!

The rule you quote from 2007 was edited in the 2008 book, and reads the same in 2009, as I quoted above. Instead of saying, "FP catchers cannot wear the plastic face mask/guard", it now reads, "Fast pitch catchers cannot merely wear the plastic face mask/guard".

Somewhere along the the line, the rule was modified. Somebody purposely and consciously added the "merely" in there. That changes the context of the rule. The old rule flat-out prohibited this type of mask. The newer version suggests that the plastic guard, alone by itself, is not acceptable but could be worn in conjuction with an "approved" helmet.

We have a rule that suggests the "Game Face" type guard is acceptable, along with a Safety Guide that explicitly says it's acceptable. The Safety Guide also says that a "batting helmet" is acceptable headgear for a catcher.

If a catcher came out in one of your games wearing a batting helmet and a Game Face mask would you allow it?


Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
The Game Face or similar products to not carry NOCSAE-approval stamps, therefore would not be considered "approved".
The equipment rules specify that batting helmets worn by offensive players must be NOCSAE approved, as do face masks attached to those helmets.

They do not specify NOCSAE approval for catcher's face masks, catcher's helmets or for any helmet worn by a defensive player in the field. So what does "approved" mean for those?

To answer my own question, I take it that "approved" in this sense means equipment that is acceptable through custom and practice. We know what a commercially available catcher's mask looks like and if what the catcher is wearing looks like one in good working order, it fits the bill. Absent a rule-specified standard, the "approval" is at the discretion of the umpire or game administrators.

No, this isn't something I'm going to lose any sleep over or expect to have a huge headache with once the season get underway. It's merely an observation on the title subject- the 2009 rule book.

Why publish a Safety Guide that contains information that conflicts with the printed rules? But, enough on the subject. I'm typing this post on my laptop while enjoying a good soak in my hot tub. The battery is running low and I'm going to need to reach over and plug in the power cord...

Last edited by BretMan; Wed Feb 11, 2009 at 11:11am.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 11, 2009, 11:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
I disagree.

Both sentences clearly indicate that a plastic face mask worn by a catcher must be approved.
Are you distantly related to Lewis Carroll? Or, maybe Bill Clinton?
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 11, 2009, 01:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Here's what I have heard on the topic.

The older rule that said a FP catcher could not wear a plastic face guard was editorially changed; the change doesn't (intend to) suggest that the plastic face guard might replace the mandated equipment, it is intended to now allow the faceguard to worn in addition to the required equipment. The former wording made that (both) illegal; while I don't expect to see a catcher wearing a GameFace or equivalent in addition to the required equipment, that change now makes it possible.

The Safety Guide wording is, quite simply, wrong; if you look at the wording for JO slowpitch catchers in the following paragraph, it is word-for-word, other than the last sentence regarding a throat protector. They (the editors) let the lesser slowpitch requirements be printed for both fastpitch and slowpitch. Thankfully, I don't believe anyone is foolish enough to believe that this would supercede the rule.

In re: a 2009 .PDF file, we were given a CD at the UIC Clinic with the 2009 Rulebook, Casebook, Umpire Manual and Clinic Guide. Since they exist, it is likely (and reasonably) only a matter of time before they are also commercially available.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 11, 2009, 03:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post

The Safety Guide wording is, quite simply, wrong; if you look at the wording for JO slowpitch catchers in the following paragraph, it is word-for-word, other than the last sentence regarding a throat protector. They (the editors) let the lesser slowpitch requirements be printed for both fastpitch and slowpitch. Thankfully, I don't believe anyone is foolish enough to believe that this would supercede the rule.
I'm sure there are plenty of explanations to go around. You look at it as wrong, I think CYA. Just like folks who used to argue that "resin" was incorrect and it should be "rosin".

Just because it is noted where it is, doesn't necessarily make it wrong. For all we know, someone had the foresight of what may be to come. After all, a couple years ago a batter's helmet was developed and produced as a single piece w/NOCSAE approval. Unfortunately, that did not coincide with the wording of the rule. Who is to say we will not see an approved one-piece plastic helmet or plastic face mask strong enough to be awarded NOCSAE approval?

The SAG is simply what it states, a GUIDE, not a rule. Of course, there already have been and will be folks who are going to want to cite the SAG as it applies to the game.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 12, 2009, 12:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
p.163 "Anyone who has played softball, or any other contact sport..."

__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 12, 2009, 12:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi View Post
p.163 "Anyone who has played softball, or any other contact sport..."

How to you tag someone without contact?
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 17, 2009, 03:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
How to you tag someone without contact?
"Spock, I said put your phaser on stun!!!"

To the best of my knowledge there has not never nohow been a NOCSAE standard for a catcher's MASK.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 17, 2009, 08:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkbjones View Post
"Spock, I said put your phaser on stun!!!"

To the best of my knowledge there has not never nohow been a NOCSAE standard for a catcher's MASK.
For the mask itself, that may be true. But in today's world, the catcher's headgear comes as a single unit and meet a NOCSAE standard.

A couple years ago at an ASA National equipment check-in, many of the catchers brought their helmet/masks and showed us the NOCSAE stamp, even though we did not request to see it.

And there are no NOCSAE requirements made by ASA, but that doesn't mean it gets ignored. While ASA demands an "approved" mask, I don't see where the standard of approval is noted.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New 2009 BRD Questions SAump Baseball 18 Wed Dec 31, 2008 01:08am
ASA 2009 Code Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 13 Mon Nov 17, 2008 03:22pm
ASA UIC Clinic 2009 SRW Softball 17 Mon Aug 18, 2008 09:38am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1