The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 3.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 07, 2008, 07:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
In fact, I predicted his exact argument in a commentary I wrote about the removal of "intent" at the time the change was made. Here it is, again,...
Which was my stance when I spoke against the change at every committee meeting I could attend in Colorado Springs. This was such an intriging topic among umpires, it was being discussed at length by a few of us in the hotel lobby, were interupted by a fire alarm and the discussion continued in the parking lot.

I understood their explanations, but saw no reason to remove what they considered extraneous information since it actually provided more precise information in rules where, as we are still experiencing, some umpires need additional guidance.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Running Lane tcblue13 Softball 21 Sun Jul 15, 2007 01:46pm
Running Lane Interference Mike Walsh Baseball 13 Tue Dec 06, 2005 05:59pm
Running Lane englanj5 Baseball 13 Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:39pm
running lane interference mrm21711 Baseball 21 Tue May 04, 2004 01:05pm
30' Running Lane bobbrix Softball 16 Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:20am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1