The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 09:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by greymule
I believe the rule and the RS are in conflict. The way I have called this play is this: if the contact was avoidable (not necessarily intentional, e.g., ball deflects off F1 toward F6, and the runner from 2B collides with F6 who is in front of the runner and in clear position to make an out), then I call INT. If the ball deflects such that F6 has to chase it down, and F6 collides with the moving runner, then no INT.

Thats a good way to put it.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deflected ball and interference WestMichBlue Softball 10 Tue Oct 18, 2005 06:33pm
Ball lodged in glove: FED interpretation Carl Childress Baseball 67 Tue Oct 12, 2004 07:24am
Runner hit by batted, deflected ball Bluefoot Softball 8 Sun Jun 20, 2004 04:18pm
Runner hit by batted ball after deflected by pitcher tiny Baseball 6 Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:24am
Ball deflected out of play Duke Softball 2 Sat May 10, 2003 05:47am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1