The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:01am
GDW GDW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 11
Question What's the call?

I was watching a game last week. BR hits ball to the fence. Catcher (appropriately) positions herself slightly in front of home plate and just inside the 3rd base line.

As BR comes in home, catcher is carried backwards into base line to catch a high throw and couldn't see runner. Runner was so close and the play so fast that they crashed.

Catcher drops ball and runner goes down injured. PU counted run but I'm not sure exactly what his call was.

What is the correct call here?
__________________
"Lord, please give me keen sight, quick recall and most of all PATIENCE! " (An umpire's prayer)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:16am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
What ruleset?
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:19am
GDW GDW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 11
ASA. 12-under Rec.
__________________
"Lord, please give me keen sight, quick recall and most of all PATIENCE! " (An umpire's prayer)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 281
Send a message via AIM to charliej47 Send a message via MSN to charliej47 Send a message via Yahoo to charliej47
Trainwreck
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by charliej47
Trainwreck
Meaning "nothing happened." Run counts.
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:26am
GDW GDW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 11
Based on what rule interpretation? I'm not questioning your response, I just want know exactly in case I'm behind the plate when it happens again.

Thanks.
__________________
"Lord, please give me keen sight, quick recall and most of all PATIENCE! " (An umpire's prayer)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by charliej47
Trainwreck
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that there is no such thing as a trainwreck any more in ASA ball. The only exception is the bunted ball in front of the plate and the RH batter and F2 collide as they are both doing what they are expected to do.

It's either obstruction or interference...so my question would be - did the catcher have the ball at the time of the collision?
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 10:54am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
HTBT. Probably OBS. If the 12U BR can hit to the fence, I'm more than likely gonna give her HP, not send her back to 3B.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 11:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that there is no such thing as a trainwreck any more in ASA ball. The only exception is the bunted ball in front of the plate and the RH batter and F2 collide as they are both doing what they are expected to do.

It's either obstruction or interference...so my question would be - did the catcher have the ball at the time of the collision?
ASA rules supplement 13 F and G talk about this. Yes the wreck is still alive.

Paragraph F: When a defensive player is fielding a thrown ball and the flight of the ball carries or draws them into the path of the base runner, it is not a crash.

Paragraph G: When the ball, runner, and defensive player arrive at the same time and place, and contact is made, the umpire should no invoke crash rule, interference or obstruction It is a incidental contact (a.k.a. wreck)

EDIT: I posted this at same time as SRW so it is doubled up

Last edited by Dholloway1962; Thu May 01, 2008 at 11:04am.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 11:02am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that there is no such thing as a trainwreck any more in ASA ball. The only exception is the bunted ball in front of the plate and the RH batter and F2 collide as they are both doing what they are expected to do.

It's either obstruction or interference...so my question would be - did the catcher have the ball at the time of the collision?
R/S 13-F:
Quote:
When a defensive player is fielding a thrown ball and the flight of the ball carries or draws them into the path of the base runner, it is not a crash.
R/S 13-G
Quote:
When the ball, runner and the defensive player arrive at the same time and place, and contact is made, the umpire should not invoke the crash rule, interference, or obstruction. This is merely incidental contact, or
what some persons commonly call, “a wreck.”
Hence my HTBT decision.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 12:02pm
GDW GDW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 11
I was thinking interference here. I didn't think OBS because the catcher was playing a thrown ball that arrived at the same time as the player. Is it not the runner's responsibility to avoid the defensive player in the process of fielding a batted or thrown ball?
__________________
"Lord, please give me keen sight, quick recall and most of all PATIENCE! " (An umpire's prayer)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 12:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Paragraph G: When the ball, runner, and defensive player arrive at the same time and place, and contact is made, the umpire should no invoke crash rule, interference or obstruction It is a incidental contact (a.k.a. wreck)
Which I believe is very poor and antiquated advice that contradicts the rules. The situations cited are all HTBT judgment calls and no blanket statement should be made concerning the enforcement.

With the exception of the BR/C collision path, the rules and equipment have been manipulated to make insure the runner and defender are never in the same place at the same time.

How often is this the result of poor defensive play? So, when F3 lunges off 1B for a wide throw and knocks the BR to the ground as the ball goes flying by, the umpire should rule a "train wreck" and the runner out, if tagged.

Of course, this is JMO.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 12:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 281
Send a message via AIM to charliej47 Send a message via MSN to charliej47 Send a message via Yahoo to charliej47
Irish,

I have had F3 and F5 lunge off the base on a bad throw and I have always called OBS. I might not have read the post closely, but I agree with you on it is a HTBT call. Base on what I read, i am giving input on opinions and mine is "trainwreck".
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 12:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northridge CA
Posts: 77
Agreed HTBT.

However, I look at this situation as a three step approach and it all depends on the location of the ball.

1. The fielder is drawn into the path of the runner and when contact is made the fielder does not have possession of the ball. Obstruction. RS 13 F unlike 13 G does not indicate that obstruction should not be called, only do not call a crash and the runner out as a result.

2. When the ball, runner and the defensive player arrive at the same time and place, and contact is made, the umpire should not invoke the crash rule, interference, or obstruction. This is merely incidental contact, or
what some persons commonly call, “a wreck.”

3. The fielder has possession of the ball and is waiting to apply the tag when the runner crashes into the fielder. Interference and the runner is out.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 01, 2008, 01:04pm
GDW GDW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 11
More info

Quote:
Originally Posted by MGKBLUE
Agreed HTBT.

However, I look at this situation as a three step approach and it all depends on the location of the ball.

1. The fielder is drawn into the path of the runner and when contact is made the fielder does not have possession of the ball. Obstruction. RS 13 F unlike 13 G does not indicate that obstruction should not be called, only do not call a crash and the runner out as a result.

2. When the ball, runner and the defensive player arrive at the same time and place, and contact is made, the umpire should not invoke the crash rule, interference, or obstruction. This is merely incidental contact, or
what some persons commonly call, “a wreck.”

3. The fielder has possession of the ball and is waiting to apply the tag when the runner crashes into the fielder. Interference and the runner is out.
In the case I submitted, the ball, defensive player and runner all arrived at the same time. Ball made it into F2's glove but was knocked loose in collision. Runner never made it to HP because she went downt injured. Run was awarded to offense.

I'm a newby, so I really want to get a good understanding of the right call here. Thanks.
__________________
"Lord, please give me keen sight, quick recall and most of all PATIENCE! " (An umpire's prayer)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The right call or the correct call? Nevadaref Basketball 9 Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21am
ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection DaveASA/FED Softball 28 Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm
To call or not to call foul ball DaveASA/FED Softball 11 Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am
More Pacers/Pistons call/no call OverAndBack Basketball 36 Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm
Good Call / Bad Call whiskers_ump Softball 29 Fri Mar 28, 2003 09:35am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1