Do you agree with this non-call?

[Andy]

Your question from the OP was:

Originally Posted by WestMichBlue

Agree? Or would you have called interference?

My response was that I wanted more information than you shared to either agree or disagree. I expanded on that with the information that I thought was applicable.

Your next question was:

Originally Posted by WestMichBlue

...do I judge why F6 did not move to the ball, based on my opinion whether or not R1 was in the way?

Or do I require F6 to make an effort to play on the ball, and then pull up if R1 is in the way?

You set your own standard here....personally, I need to see some effort by F6 to play the ball if a collision is not imminent.

It is my opinion that the proximity of the players in question is a significant factor in whether interference is called or not.

[Dakota]

I agree with your no-call. Even though she may have chosen to stop because of R1, that does not mean (in my view) that R1 interfered. Maybe she is polite. Maybe she is a timid player. Maybe she doesn't want to risk getting hurt. Maybe, maybe. You couldn't know, and in your judgment, she should have / could have been more aggressive in her pursuit of the batted ball. As I said, I agree with your no-call.