The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 13, 2007, 11:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Steve, I think it is way too vague. This past year saw quite a few umpires, in spite of being told to not overreact to the changes involving INT by a batter get extremely overofficious with this situation. I've even had people claim that it was INT because the batter DIDN'T make a move to avoid the catcher's throw.

Too much BS. I don't believe there were half the problems involving INT on the batter before ASA started screwing around with the INT rules last year.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Final 2008 NCAA Rule Changes SRW Softball 24 Thu Sep 27, 2007 05:45pm
2008 NCAA rule book Tio Basketball 3 Tue Sep 18, 2007 09:31pm
NFHS 2008 rule changes Dakota Softball 44 Sat Jul 14, 2007 09:35pm
FED Releases Rule Changes for 2008 ozzy6900 Baseball 1 Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:07am
Rule Change Proposals ChuckElias Basketball 124 Sun Mar 11, 2007 03:24am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1