Ruling in ASA: Interference? - The Official Forum

#5 (permalink)

Thu Jun 14, 2007, 06:01pm

HawkeyeCubP HawkeyeCubP is offline

(Something hilarious)

Join Date: Jan 2006

Location: These United States

Posts: 1,162

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dakota

It is definitionally interference. Then, 8-7-Q, call it a micro crash. Or, if you think it necessary, 10-1.

I'll buy 1 and 10.1.

Although the term micro-crash makes me laugh, I don't know if I'd bring that up to an upset player or coach. I feel that 8.7.J can't truly apply, per se, until an additional bullet number is added to include "With a fielder in possession of the ball attempting to tag a runner." - or some variation thereof.

Thanks for the response.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Your ruling?	mcrowder	Softball	30	Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:06am
Runner interference versus umpire interference	Jay R	Baseball	1	Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm
What's the ruling	skeeter1114	Softball	5	Fri Sep 10, 2004 09:13am
Ruling PLease	sm_bbcoach	Baseball	5	Sat Jul 12, 2003 05:41am
Ruling please	oppool	Softball	1	Mon May 07, 2001 06:23am

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56am.