|
|
|
Fri Jun 08, 2007, 01:48pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
If anything at all, I would rule that the run counts and I *might* eject the player for unsportsmanlike conduct. I'd lean a little more towards the "wreck" side of things. Very HTBT.
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. 
|
|
Fri Jun 08, 2007, 02:40pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, I wouldn't.
If anything, the only penalty you have is USC and all you can do with that is eject the player. Unless, in your judgment, you believe the catcher could have possibly retired R3 when the collision occured, then you could rule that runner out. But don't do that just to penalize the team. If there was no play, there is no INT.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No-call train wreck? | mplagrow | Basketball | 21 | Sat Feb 11, 2006 09:36pm |
| Train wreck no call UW/Pacific | zebraman | Basketball | 16 | Tue Mar 22, 2005 09:24am |
| Train wreck gone? | WestMichBlue | Softball | 13 | Thu Feb 17, 2005 04:10pm |
| Obstruction / Malicious Contact | mcrowder | Softball | 32 | Fri May 21, 2004 02:22pm |
| Malicious Contact (FED) | Gre144 | Baseball | 1 | Tue Jun 26, 2001 09:12am |
Hybrid Mode
