The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 30, 2007, 06:33pm
Never Stop Learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 518
Catchers Obstruction

Had a situation the other night in my game and was asked by a coach a few nights later about the same situation in an out of town game. The batter squares to bunt but decides the pitch is a ball and pulls the bat back. While bringing the bat back it hits the catchers glove. I didn't call catchers obstruction due to the batter being in the act of pulling the bat back. The rule in ASA and NFHS both are along the same line. They both state that when the catcher obstructs, hinders, or prevents the batter from hitting the ball. My take is the batter is not trying to hit the ball, but just the opposite. What are some other peoples thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 30, 2007, 06:40pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
How can you be sure that she wasn't pulling back to then chop at the ball as the pitch came in? I got OBS on this one.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 30, 2007, 11:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
How can you be sure that she wasn't pulling back to then chop at the ball as the pitch came in? I got OBS on this one.
That's why we get the big bucks. Unless there was actually a possibility of the batter striking the ball, it is nothing.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 02:00am
Never Stop Learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 518
That is a good point Sean, but in both cases the ball was at the catcher by the time the bat hit the glove. Like Mike says that's why we get paid the big bucks, to make a decision and take the heat. In my case there was no way the batter could have hit the ball after pulling back. The coach told me that in the other one the ball was past the catcher.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 08:11am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
That's why we get the big bucks. Unless there was actually a possibility of the batter striking the ball, it is nothing.
Hmmm... so either you're telling me that I now need to determine intent on whether she's going to swing the bat, or that it's a HTBT situation.

Ed: Was there a R on 3B?
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 08:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
Hmmm... so either you're telling me that I now need to determine intent on whether she's going to swing the bat, or that it's a HTBT situation.

Ed: Was there a R on 3B?
Seems to me you have determine if the rule applies. If the batter wasnt hindered, obstructed etc... then it doesnt apply.

There are distinct differences in action when pulling a bat back and pulling a bat back and then trying to chop the ball.

Its not a stretch that the average umpire can see the difference.. certainly in most cases.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 08:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 48
Quote:
Hmmm... so either you're telling me that I now need to determine intent on whether she's going to swing the bat, or that it's a HTBT situation.
If determining "intent" on wheter or not she's going to swing the bat is a "toughie".....then I don't know what to say.

The balls on it's way to the catchers mitt when she's trying to bring it back. If you think she has enough time to draw it back...and still get off a swing.....call what you see. If you can't tell by her posture and where she's carrying the bat......nothing anyone in here can tell you will help you.
__________________
The more people I meet.....the more I love my dogs.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 10:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
Hmmm... so either you're telling me that I now need to determine intent on whether she's going to swing the bat, or that it's a HTBT situation.
I didn't say that, you did. I stated that it could be OBS only if there was a possibility of the batter hitting the ball.

Besides, do you not have to determine intent every time a batter squares to bunt?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 01:20pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
I didn't say that, you did. I stated that it could be OBS only if there was a possibility of the batter hitting the ball.

Besides, do you not have to determine intent every time a batter squares to bunt?
I guess where I'm going with this is, either we have OBS or we have INT. I don't buy the "incidental contact" argument. There's always a possibility of the batter hitting the ball, because we can't gauge the batter's intent to swing or not. If this were the case, then I've got OBS.

If I have a R on base, then there could be a possibility that by making contact with F2's glove/mitt, INT has occured. The Batter could have possibly INT'd with F2's opportunity to make a play.

In essence, it's a HTBT/judgement kind of thing. I could go either way... but I'm not just gonna call nothing.

(I don't see where you're going with the bunt question...)
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 02:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
How can you be sure that she wasn't pulling back to then chop at the ball as the pitch came in?
Don't forget, no judging of intent (j/K).

I think I'd have a big nothing on this...just a ball or strike and play ball.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 06:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 48
Quote:
That's why we get the big bucks. Unless there was actually a possibility of the batter striking the ball, it is nothing.
Agree with Mike. You know "IT" when you see "IT".
__________________
The more people I meet.....the more I love my dogs.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad Catchers radwaste50 Baseball 5 Mon Apr 17, 2006 01:39am
Catchers Interference ??? Bandit Softball 7 Thu May 27, 2004 11:51am
catchers that can't catch------ SWFLguy Softball 1 Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:38pm
Catchers balk? chuckfan1 Baseball 20 Fri Jul 11, 2003 09:16am
Catchers Obstruction collinb Baseball 2 Sun Jun 29, 2003 08:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1