|
Sun May 27, 2007, 08:22am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Speaking ASA
Remember, the 3' lane and associated INT call had nothing to do with the play being made on the runner, but the defender's ability to receive the throw at 1B (8.2.E). If there is no throw to receive, the rule is not in effect. And remember, if there is a throw, it must be a throw which a defender (not just F3) can actually catch in the vicinity of 1B.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Last season generally good for refs, but inconsistency an issue | HLin NC | Football | 5 | Tue May 22, 2007 11:10pm |
| Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
| Interference | jesmael | Baseball | 8 | Fri Jun 14, 2002 11:20am |
| T after "end" of game...inconsistency in the rules? | Lotto | Basketball | 5 | Thu Nov 01, 2001 03:44pm |
| Inconsistency in NF rules? | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 3 | Tue Dec 26, 2000 11:33am |
Threaded Mode
