The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 13, 2007, 10:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
In this world of technology and space-age mathematics, why is it so difficult to believe that comparative studies between the 2000 & 2004 test results could not determine whether a bat tested under the earlier test would have qualified under the latter?
Damn. Just what I was going to say, Mike. That's why you make the big bucks. Thank you.

If x + y = xy in 2000, x + y probably still equals xy in 2004, 2007, and 2695.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bats alphaump Softball 1 Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:03am
Bats mccann Softball 3 Sun Aug 14, 2005 07:57pm
Bats nhg41 Softball 3 Tue Nov 16, 2004 07:19am
ASA & Bats IRISHMAFIA Softball 20 Wed Jun 11, 2003 11:52am
ASA bats oppool Softball 3 Sun Feb 11, 2001 09:09pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1