When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent

#20 (permalink)

Wed Apr 11, 2007, 07:56am

mcrowder

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Dec 2003

Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)

Posts: 4,047

Quote:

Originally Posted by wadeintothem

Really?
Cause I got INT this year, scenario taken at face value.

Intent to break up a double play is still interference - both this year and last year. I see no difference in the call on this play between LY and TY. I have INT LY and TY if (HTBT) I felt there was intent on the runner's part to break up a possible DP.

You seem to have a difference on thsi play between TY and LY, but you don't explain why - can you explain?

__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Pac-10 T right or wrong?	Nevadaref	Basketball	35	Sun Mar 11, 2007 02:00am
Right or Wrong	wobster	Baseball	10	Thu Jun 17, 2004 01:56pm
NCAA Pass Interference - Intent required?	mwingram	Football	2	Sat Nov 09, 2002 12:54pm
I called ump interference. Right or wrong?	Danny R	Baseball	2	Wed May 01, 2002 05:47pm
Intent/Letter of the law: Interference	Patrick Szalapski	Baseball	1	Sat Mar 17, 2001 07:20pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01am.