When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent

		The Official Forum > Softball
When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent

Rate Thread

Display Modes

#18 (permalink)

Tue Apr 10, 2007, 10:25am

mcrowder

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Dec 2003

Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)

Posts: 4,047

There was no rule change.

Just a wording change to help those umpires who were previously ruling incorrectly to now find it easier to rule correctly.

If the "new" wording is causing you to now rule correctly, and this ruling differs from what you would have done last year ... then it follows that you were ruling incorrectly LAST year, and this wording change has got you to rule correctly.

So I guess the wording change worked for you.

__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Pac-10 T right or wrong?	Nevadaref	Basketball	35	Sun Mar 11, 2007 02:00am
Right or Wrong	wobster	Baseball	10	Thu Jun 17, 2004 01:56pm
NCAA Pass Interference - Intent required?	mwingram	Football	2	Sat Nov 09, 2002 12:54pm
I called ump interference. Right or wrong?	Danny R	Baseball	2	Wed May 01, 2002 05:47pm
Intent/Letter of the law: Interference	Patrick Szalapski	Baseball	1	Sat Mar 17, 2001 07:20pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58am.