When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by wadeintothem

I feel I understand what they want, but with that, I've realized the national staff out and out telling me there was no change in enforcement is incorrect. There is.

wade, those two highlighted statements appear to me to be incompatible. The national staff is telling you what they want - no change in what would have been the correct enforcement, yet you are insisting there is a change. Maybe you are taking this removal of "intentional" farther than the national staff wants?