![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
I missed that thread and video on ezteamz.
Did that umpire Call INT????? You know mike, I'm trying to make the best of this rule change, and it IS a rule change, I dont care what they say - but even with this change, its not INT. The rule used to mean "on purpose" and now it means "causes" - so thats a change and its taught as a change but soft shoed to "not a change"... but it IS. But even with this change, I dont see how anyone can reasonably call INT on that video. We'll see how the season goes - TB hasnt really started up. I've worked one "A" tourney (A used VERY loosely) and some rec...
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pac-10 T right or wrong? | Nevadaref | Basketball | 35 | Sun Mar 11, 2007 02:00am |
Right or Wrong | wobster | Baseball | 10 | Thu Jun 17, 2004 01:56pm |
NCAA Pass Interference - Intent required? | mwingram | Football | 2 | Sat Nov 09, 2002 12:54pm |
I called ump interference. Right or wrong? | Danny R | Baseball | 2 | Wed May 01, 2002 05:47pm |
Intent/Letter of the law: Interference | Patrick Szalapski | Baseball | 1 | Sat Mar 17, 2001 07:20pm |