No "Intent" in interference - The Official Forum

#8 (permalink)

Thu Jan 25, 2007, 09:15pm

wadeintothem wadeintothem is offline

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Mar 2004

Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns

Posts: 3,220

also at the clinic I brought up the INT scenario to the National guy that we discussed at length a couple of months ago and it was too quickly dismissed as "INT" (which I agree with) without any (or enough) thought given to the scenario.

__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The 3 versus 2 fallacies, a mini-rant - "Part deux"	imaref	Basketball	6	Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:39am
Why "general" and "additional"?	Back In The Saddle	Basketball	1	Sat Oct 07, 2006 02:56pm
"Balk" or "Ball"	johnnyg08	Baseball	9	Fri Aug 18, 2006 08:26am
Batter Interference or "Thats Nothin"	oneonone	Softball	5	Sun Jun 11, 2006 09:02pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03pm.