[AtlUmpSteve]

The "intent" wasn't simply removed; it was replaced with the word and concept "actively". So, I ask you, in your play, what was done by the runner to "actively" interfere?

If R1 throws her hands up, and the ball hits her hands and deflects away, maybe. This concept requires the person who interferes to do something specific which creates the interference. Just as before. We just don't have to get in her head to try to figure out why she did it; if she did it (and "it" isn't simply doing what she should do), and it interferes, it is interference.

Does that help? Or am I just talking to convince myself?