The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 03, 2006, 10:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 56
Biggest problem here is intent. We can't jump into their minds and know what they intended to do. No rule says where a fielder can or cannot stand in the field of play. I got nothing. If coach complains, tell the coach, "tell me where it says the first baseman can't stand between the runner and pitcher?"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 03, 2006, 11:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 57
Nothing!

That's one reason the 1st base coach is there. He/she has the option of moving in the coach's box, while the runner is "tied" to the base, in a manner of speaking.

If I were the runner, and the defensive player is standing in the baseline: once the ball leaves the pitcher's hand, I'm running into the defensive player (not in a malicious manner, of course) and asking for an obstruction call on my attempted steal.
__________________
Lloyd
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 03, 2006, 03:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
I agree it's nothing by rule, except NCAA etc.

For arguement/devil-advocate sake, if we ask the question of whether the defense position impeded or hindered the runner's progress, then what?

Is it any less of an impediment than verbal obstruction?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 03, 2006, 05:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
I agree it's nothing by rule, except NCAA etc.

For arguement/devil-advocate sake, if we ask the question of whether the defense position impeded or hindered the runner's progress, then what?

Is it any less of an impediment than verbal obstruction?
Okay, let's go in this direction.

Where is the impediment? Why would anyone think that a runner has a "right" to be able see the pitcher's release? If a RHP releases the ball at a point the runner on first cannot see it, should the pitch be illegal?

Following the same train of thought, if a fielder catches a fly ball, should they be called for OBS if the runners couldn't see the catch and could not legally leave the base sooner as if they could if the contact with the ball was visible?

And as noted before, with the exception of the pitcher on the PP, the catcher in the box and all others in fair territory, why would an umpire take it upon themselves to "place" a player and risk a protest?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
another view LMan Baseball 47 Fri Oct 28, 2005 03:17pm
Blocked View blueump Baseball 7 Fri May 06, 2005 12:49pm
Your view please debeau Softball 20 Tue Mar 22, 2005 10:17am
The View from the Other Side rainmaker Basketball 9 Wed Dec 01, 2004 01:33pm
the view from the bench mrsref Basketball 15 Thu Jan 20, 2000 03:56pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1