![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
When ASA started the certification markings in 2000, you are correct. The Fed demanded all base be properly marked. However, that went by the wayside a couple of years ago. For that matter, in my area, the NFHS UIC asked the coaches and umpire what they thought it should be and he was in Indianapolis for their explanation. Just another one of those "hanging chads" from my good buddies.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
"The following is the NFHS Bat Performance Specifications as well as the PIAA procedure. This procedure is slightly different than the ASA in only that bat MUST have at least one (1) of the two (2) “CERTIFIED” seals as shown below to be considered legal. The “certified seals” below are the only approved seals acceptable for NFHS / PIAA competition." Let me rephrase what I said earlier - In Pa, no seal means the bat is not legal for a PIAA game.
__________________
Steve M |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASA Non-Approved Bat List Update | Bluefoot | Softball | 0 | Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:37am |
Non ASA Approved Bats | Dukat | Softball | 0 | Tue Jun 01, 2004 03:33pm |
NFHS approved bats | Dakota | Softball | 1 | Wed Sep 10, 2003 04:30pm |
Miken Ultra II approved by ASA | Tap | Softball | 3 | Mon Aug 19, 2002 09:55pm |
ASA's New Approved Uniform | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 10 | Mon Nov 05, 2001 08:01pm |