The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 25, 2006, 06:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve M
OK, maybe it's just PIAA. But, no certification imprint/mark/whatever on the bat means that the bat is not legal while it may well be perfectly legal in an ASA game.

When ASA started the certification markings in 2000, you are correct. The Fed demanded all base be properly marked.

However, that went by the wayside a couple of years ago. For that matter, in my area, the NFHS UIC asked the coaches and umpire what they thought it should be and he was in Indianapolis for their explanation.

Just another one of those "hanging chads" from my good buddies.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASA Non-Approved Bat List Update Bluefoot Softball 0 Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:37am
Non ASA Approved Bats Dukat Softball 0 Tue Jun 01, 2004 03:33pm
NFHS approved bats Dakota Softball 1 Wed Sep 10, 2003 04:30pm
Miken Ultra II approved by ASA Tap Softball 3 Mon Aug 19, 2002 09:55pm
ASA's New Approved Uniform IRISHMAFIA Softball 10 Mon Nov 05, 2001 08:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1