![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Originially, my thinking was it was a completed turn at bat. However, I think now that probably the interference negated a completed turn at bat. Is that correct. Bring 24 back to plate?
__________________
glen _______________________________ "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain. |
|
|||
I don't see how it is any different than say a runner on first and a hit to the second baseman. The runner on first interferes with the second baseman. Dead ball, runner coming from first out on interference and with less than 2 outs, BR is put on first. If two outs you don't put them on first but that BR is not the lead off batter next inning, their turn at bat is done. Dave
|
|
|||
Quote:
WMB |
|
|||
8-7 THE RUNNER IS OUT. 8-7-L NOTE: Section 7 J-L: When the runners are called out for interference, the batter-runner is awarded first base and credited with a fielders choice. EXCEPTION: If the interference prevents the fielder from catching a routine fly ball (fair or foul) with ordinary effort, the batter is also out.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Play-by-Play Commentary | FC IC | Basketball | 2 | Sat Dec 21, 2002 12:28am |
CBS play-by-play announcers: should they all be fired? | David Clausi | Basketball | 6 | Mon Mar 27, 2000 11:56pm |