The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 23, 2005, 07:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Re: Re: Casebook 6F.7-2

Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo


Doncha just love these casebook examples that like never happen? There are many more relevant and frequent situations.

Change F2 to F7 and tell me the call.
Come on, Tony, talk about plays that never happen!

When was the last time you saw F7 receive a pitch?

Apples and oranges.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 23, 2005, 10:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 741
Send a message via Yahoo to MNBlue
I would agree that the rule book is black/white, but effective officials have learned that there is a gray are for applying the rules to the game. Knowing how to prudently use the gray zone to administer the rules is what separates the good officials from the best officials.

Gray Zone = Survival
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 23, 2005, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally posted by whiskers_ump
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by bkbjones
Quote:
Originally posted by greymule


Not all rules are equal


While some points make sense, which rules are the less than equal ones? Definition of the strike zone? Batter is out when...? 7-2-c-3?

While I am not one to pick nits or look for trouble...to say some rules are "less equal" than others is (insert your favorite word/phrase here).


John,

Think that greymule meant that it is the intent and interpretation of the
rule, rather than rules being "less equal".

In you reference 7-2-c-3, it does not say batter is out if count is less than
3 strikes and enters the dugout. It does say the umpire may warn the player and may
if repeated offense occurs, call a strike. This was not stated in the originial
post. However, if in your game you wish to call someone out on two strikes, then
do so. Personally, I am bringing the batter back to complete his/her turn at
the plate.
I just threw 7-2-c-3 out there for the heck of it...didn't even think about what it was...and frankly, I'd do the very same thing: bring the batter back, complete your turn at the plate.

__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 23, 2005, 02:49pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally posted by azbigdawg
LIke I said SRW..you wouldnt agree..your first comments told me that......its overofficiating.....say what you what about "umpires like me".....and Ill say what I want about "umpires like you"...gawd.....
Is calling Rule 5-7-B (4th defensive conference, pull your pitcher, coach) being overofficious? How does calling one rule differ from another?
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 23, 2005, 05:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Desert....
Posts: 826
SRW..if you havent learned that one..there is nothing that I can tell you to change your mind
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 23, 2005, 06:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 870
Re: Re: Re: Casebook 6F.7-2

Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo


Doncha just love these casebook examples that like never happen? There are many more relevant and frequent situations.

Change F2 to F7 and tell me the call.
Come on, Tony, talk about plays that never happen!

When was the last time you saw F7 receive a pitch?

Apples and oranges.
LOL Mike, but F2 didn't recieve a pitch. F2 was retrieving a foul ball.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 23, 2005, 08:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Re: Re: Re: Re: Casebook 6F.7-2

Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo


LOL Mike, but F2 didn't recieve a pitch. F2 was retrieving a foul ball.
That is true, but it is the premise of the rule, isn't it?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 24, 2005, 07:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 870
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Casebook 6F.7-2

Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by tcannizzo


LOL Mike, but F2 didn't recieve a pitch. F2 was retrieving a foul ball.
That is true, but it is the premise of the rule, isn't it?
I agree. Based on the premise of the rule, I think it is ludicrous that if F2 was retrieving a foul ball and throws it to any other player than F1 that a ball is awarded. Sure, the normal job of F2 is to receive a pitch, but the case book has gone into the weeds on this one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1