The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 02:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA/NJ
Posts: 58
OK....

Being a new umpire (ASA Cadet), I understood the D3K Rule as "Less than two out, 1st Base Unoccupied" or "2 outs, 1st Base Occupied".

Worked a 14U Girls game and my experienced partner allowed the BR to advance to 1st when there were 2 out and 1st was unoccupied. The catcher threw her out. However, between innings, my partner stated that when there are two outs, it doesn't matter if 1st is or isn't occupied. Was he correct??? I understood it to be with two out, BR could not attempt to advance to 1st on a dropped third strike.

HELP!!!!



Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 02:11pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Draw yourself a logic chart:

1) Is 1B occupied?
1a) If Yes, goto 2
1b) If No, D3K is ON

2) How many outs?
2a) If 0 or 1, D3K is OFF
2b) If 2, D3K is ON

Your partner was correct.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 02:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by dacodee
OK....

Being a new umpire (ASA Cadet), I understood the D3K Rule as "Less than two out, 1st Base Unoccupied" or "2 outs, 1st Base Occupied".

Worked a 14U Girls game and my experienced partner allowed the BR to advance to 1st when there were 2 out and 1st was unoccupied. The catcher threw her out. However, between innings, my partner stated that when there are two outs, it doesn't matter if 1st is or isn't occupied. Was he correct??? I understood it to be with two out, BR could not attempt to advance to 1st on a dropped third strike.

Your partner is correct. There was a proposed rule change last year that was supposed to be handled through standard housekeeping eliminating all words after "two outs" in the rule book that was overlooked in the end. I've been told it will be changed this year.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 02:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
ASA reworded Rule 8-1-B for their 2003 book and inadvertently created a technical error, since "2 outs, 1B unoccupied" is not included. Obviously, all that's needed is, "(1) With fewer than two outs OR (2) With 1B unoccupied."
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 02:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 964
dacodee - when you understand the "Why" it is easier to apply the rule.

If there are runners in force positions (1B, 1B & 2B, or 1B, 2B, & 3B), the catcher can delibertely drop a third strike, pick it up and throw to a base for a force out, and the relay to 1B would complete a double play - one more out than the defense deserved (for the strike out).

So the rule makers said if 1B is occupied then the batter is automatically out - thus no chance for a cheap second out.

OK, so what if there are two outs? Can't get a double play, can you? So the automatic out is off, and the batter-runner now has to be put out if the 3rd strike is not caught.

WMB


Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 03:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 92
And remeber...

Although it goes without saying to most of the veterans here, since the original poster is new, and may not have seen this one - if bases are loaded, and 2 outs the catcher can simply pick up the ball and touch the plate since the force is in effect. The first time I saw it, I thought it looked a bit screwy, but it is legal.
__________________
Troy
ASA/NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 03:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA/NJ
Posts: 58
Thank you all so very much!

I'll tell you... Everytime I've brought an issue to this forum, I've gotten great feedback.

All of you, Take Care! and Have a great holiday weekend.

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 03:38pm
Statistician/Ref Hybrid
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 1,044
Re: And remeber...

Quote:
Originally posted by streamdoc
Although it goes without saying to most of the veterans here, since the original poster is new, and may not have seen this one - if bases are loaded, and 2 outs the catcher can simply pick up the ball and touch the plate since the force is in effect. The first time I saw it, I thought it looked a bit screwy, but it is legal.
Had this happen once several years ago. Our JV catcher couldn't catch strike 3 but tagged the plate at our coach's reminder. Funny part is, the opposing team's coach wanted to know why the runner on 3rd was out. (Gee, it's a force out)
__________________
"Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible." – Dalai Lama

The center of attention as the lead & trail. – me
Games officiated: 525 Basketball · 76 Softball · 16 Baseball
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 30, 2005, 09:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 139
Re: Re: And remeber...

Quote:
Originally posted by Stat-Man
Quote:
Originally posted by streamdoc
Although it goes without saying to most of the veterans here, since the original poster is new, and may not have seen this one - if bases are loaded, and 2 outs the catcher can simply pick up the ball and touch the plate since the force is in effect. The first time I saw it, I thought it looked a bit screwy, but it is legal.
Had this happen once several years ago. Our JV catcher couldn't catch strike 3 but tagged the plate at our coach's reminder. Funny part is, the opposing team's coach wanted to know why the runner on 3rd was out. (Gee, it's a force out)
Not to hard to understand, you are talking about a JV coach,right?
__________________
David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1