The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 10, 2005, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,158
JV tourney championship game. 1 man crew. Me..R1 on 2B. Base hit to RF. Runner on 2B comes around 3RD Full steam ahead for home . Catcher sets up blocking home but runner is still a good 15 feet up the line. Catcher now has ball I glance runner still full steam ahead 7 or so feet from home. Collison I call runner out. Coach wants OBS-says catcher blocked home but in my judgement the progress of the runner was not impeded. She did not slow up, change direction or anything other than full steam ahead. Did I kick the call or was it a HTBT ? Or am I totally missing this one ? Feedback please.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 10, 2005, 01:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
Sounds like no obstruction to me, based on

"She did not slow up, change direction or anything other than full steam ahead."

Must have looked that way to you, too - based on

"Coach wants OBS-says catcher blocked home but in my judgement the progress of the runner was not impeded."

Now, in keeping with our NZ friend, who says to always start teching new umps with the definitions, (and that's a very good approach) - what does the Fed book define obstruction as? Look in Rule 2, under the definition for obstruction. After you do that, tell me was this runner obstructed?
__________________
Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 10, 2005, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 190
Your call is correct.The catcher may block the plate when in possession of the ball prior to the runner arriving at the plate.It would be OBS if she blocked the plate before receiving the ball.If you felt the contact was malicious,you have the out plus the runner is ejected and restricted to the dugout in NFHS play.Good Call!

Jeff
NCAA Umpire
NFHS Umpire
ASA Umpire
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 10, 2005, 01:36pm
softball_junky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Sounds like a good call to me
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 11, 2005, 03:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
This is one of your NZ friends .
15 ft which is about 3 metres .No slow down ,deviation
Nailed and out !
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 11, 2005, 09:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Uh, 15 feet is just short of 5 metres. Or meters.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 11, 2005, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,158
So my next question to call OBS , when the runner is not at the base yet, the runner has to deviate or maybe even pull up ? I am really trying to get this right. I am being easy on myself in regards to this particular play because of the 1 man crew SITCH. So now all I have to do is figure out DP/Flex. LOL

Thanks for all the feedback. Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 11, 2005, 10:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 962
For OBS to occur the runner HAS to do something as a result of the fielder. Change direction, slow down, stutter step trip etc. So if the fielder has the ball it doesn't count, but any other time it is OBS. BUT, and I have seen it called, the runner has to react to the fielder to be able to get an OBS call. I had a coach ask me about the 2nd basewoman covering on a bunt saying she was covering too much base (fed only white bag) I watched and to me she was covering a lot of the bag, BUT the runners never slowed, or turned or reacted to her presence so there was no OBS. I am sure that someone will correct me if I am wrong but to me being in the way is not enough for OBS, you have to "be in the way" and cause the runner to react to it.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 11, 2005, 11:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Check the editorial here for my view.

The rule prohibits impeding the runner without possession of the ball; it does not prohibit blocking the base without possession of the ball.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 12, 2005, 03:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
mccrowder
Thank you for that correction I was thinking of something else and 5 metres is even worse .
No obstruction
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 12, 2005, 09:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,158
Dakota-the missing link

Dakota, thank you for the "it does not prohibit blocking the base without possession of the ball." I knew there was something i was trying to get my pea brain around- and that was it. One argument I heard, from a JV coach, was as soon as his runner rounded 2B the F5 had to get out from being in front of 3b. I knew that didn't sound right but didn't have the words-now I do.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1