|
Wed Mar 16, 2005, 12:43pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's where my thinking gets muddled, too.
An illegal player is an appealable infraction, right? As an analogy, missing a base is an appealable infraction. We remain quiet and only apply a penalty if appealed by the other team. Same with batting out of order. The umpire says nothing unless a proper appeal is offered. Since an illegal player is an appealable infraction, why is it treated differently than the other two? 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
