The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 964
Supposedly the requirement for NOSCAE approved masks has been in effect for 6 weeks. But - you do not have a NOSCAE standard. Is this a problem right now? (Not an issue for NFHS because we have a year to go.)

NOSCAE wrote a proposed standard in June 04 and was to keep it open for 6 months for community input. They were to legalize it in January 05. But as of mid-February it is still a proposed standard. If you have championship play right now can you enforce your new rule requiring NOSCAE approval?

WMB
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
JMO, and without benefit of ASA clinics yet, but ...

Stamped / labeled - approved.
Not stamped / labeled - not approved.

I don't need to reference the printed standard.

NOCSAE has apparently (based on one manufacturer's press announcement) been issuing approvals since at least last May.

I would not be surprised if during the early season (non-Championship play) we are instructed to ask the coach to certify that all of his team's equipment is legal, and then if it looks like a face mask, it is a face mask.

It is not at all unusual for 3rd party testing / approval agencies to begin issuing approvals after the draft standard has passed muster but before the final standard is actually published. A careful reading of the NOCSAE proposed standard on their web site will show it has had a couple of minor revisions since it was first published.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 12:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota


I would not be surprised if during the early season (non-Championship play) we are instructed to ask the coach to certify that all of his team's equipment is legal, and then if it looks like a face mask, it is a face mask.

Useless comment outside of NFHS. The coach does not have the authority to make such assertions. Well, he can make them, but it's not going to help if you end up in the witness stand.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
As I said, no rules clinics yet. Maybe they'll strictly enforce it.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Face mask standards

According to our local JO commissioner, Schutt and Rawlings have the only NOCSAE approved face masks.

A fly in the ointment is that supposedly there are no stickers for these facemasks to show they are NOCSAE approved because the standard has not been published.

(Heaving big sigh...knowing this will be a problem...)
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 04:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
I have stayed out of this topic on both boards. (There is
a very lenghty discussion on eteamz on this.)
Rule 3, Section 5, E:
E. Helments...All JO FP batting helmets shall be equipped with a securely fastened NOCSAE approved face mask guard.

Comment: To insure the new face mask/guard is permanently attached.

With the helment having the NOCSAE approval stamp/seal, and
the face mask/guard permanetly attached cannot we accept this
as being an approved combo? May be a dumb question, but just
curious.

I have done 5 HS game this year, with nine of the ten teams
involved having the face mask/guard. All the helmets were
NOCSAE approved, none of the mask/guards were attached anyway
but professionally. No face mask/guard had a NOCSAE stamp.
I personally would have accepted these in any game by any
association I was working for.

__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 05:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by whiskers_ump
I have stayed out of this topic on both boards.
Weenie!
Quote:
Originally posted by whiskers_ump
With the helment having the NOCSAE approval stamp/seal, and the face mask/guard permanetly attached cannot we accept this as being an approved combo? May be a dumb question, but just curious.
Remains to be seen how the rules clinic will go, but since I have already read the NOCSAE requirements, I know the NOCSAE answer - the mask must have its own label. Will NOCSAE change this? Good question - there is word of stick-on labels being provided, but other than postings on boards like this, I have seen nothing official.
Quote:
Originally posted by whiskers_ump
I have done 5 HS game this year, with nine of the ten teams involved having the face mask/guard. All the helmets were NOCSAE approved, none of the mask/guards were attached anyway but professionally. No face mask/guard had a NOCSAE stamp. I personally would have accepted these in any game by any association I was working for.
This is legal for NFHS (and, presumably, UIL) for 2005.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 16, 2005, 05:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
UIL

Having lived and worked in TX most of my life, making assumptions about UIL is as dangerous as ice fishing in July.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 17, 2005, 12:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Dakota
Remains to be seen how the rules clinic will go, but since I have already read the NOCSAE requirements, I know the NOCSAE answer - the mask must have its own label. Will NOCSAE change this? Good question - there is word of stick-on labels being provided, but other than postings on boards like this, I have seen nothing official
A sticker will be permitted, but has yet to be distributed. If you see any out there, they are most likely counterfeit.

Got this directly from Kevin Ryan, or was it Craig Cress? Oh well, whichever was covering this rule at the UIC Clinic in OKC.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 18, 2005, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
have asked and looked and can not find mask
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 18, 2005, 01:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by just98
have asked and looked and can not find mask
Do you mean they are sold out, or you can't find any models that say they are approved?

Here are two suppliers that say they have approved face masks:

RIPit

Schutt
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 18, 2005, 01:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
can not find, who has them?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 18, 2005, 02:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Did you try the two links I posted?
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 18, 2005, 02:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
looked at the links, whats differnt then the one on put on last fall?
except the label, can`t i just get a label?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 18, 2005, 04:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally posted by just98
looked at the links, whats differnt then the one on put on last fall?
except the label, can`t i just get a label?
No. If it didn't come from the manufacturer with either a label on it, or else the embossed stamp, then it does not meet the requirement set forth in the ASA Rule book.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1