The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 17, 2005, 02:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally posted by whiskers_ump
Just reviewed ajcr55's profile, another Texan Mike.


Well, yes Glen, TASO is, after all, the TEXAS Association of Sports Officials.

Quote:
You will find NFHS test do have a lot of questions that ask one thing and mean another.

Like this one:

Catcher unintentionally blocks the plate, which impedes a runners attempt to score. Umpire rules "no violation" since it was not intentional.

This could go either way. If catcher had the ball she is allowed to block, if she was not in possession of the ball, then there is a violation.
I don't necessarily agree with you on this one being able to go both ways, since I see this as asking about the necessity of "intent." Intent is not necessary to fulfill the obstruction rule.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1