The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 11, 2005, 02:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Cribbing for the exam, Glen?

Quote:
Originally posted by whiskers_ump
NFHS Rules

1. The DP may be substituted for by a legal substitute; the
DP will not be considered as having left the game? T/F
Question as worded: True (i.e the lineup remains at 10). However, the starting DP player will have left the game.
Quote:
2. The catcher unintentionally blocks the plate, impeding the runners attempt to score. The umpire rules "no violiation" since it was not intentional. T/F
Don't know - it may be true or it may be false, since the question is asking "the umpire did this, true?" My answer: beats me, I wasn't there.

OK, OK, the real question is "The umpire rules "no violiation" since it was not intentional. Correct? T/F"

The answer is false. Intent has no bearing on obstruction.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1