The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 27, 2004, 01:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 69
Hi Folks.

With R1 on 2nd base, ball is hit to right field, R1 is forced completely out of base path (good 7 feet) because of obstructing F5 and F6, R1 rounds 3rd and on throw from F9, a close play at home has R1 tagged out.

It is clear that R1 would've made home safely had there been no obstruction. However, BU feels that obstruction only protects R1 to the "next" base. Doesn't obstruction protect the runner to the base they would've made had their been no obstruction? And from there, they're advancing at own risk?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 27, 2004, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by sprivitor
Doesn't obstruction protect the runner to the base they would've made in the umpire's judgment had there been no obstruction? And from there, they're advancing at own risk?
Yes, with the proviso I've added.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 27, 2004, 03:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 548
Send a message via AIM to TexBlue
Quote:
Originally posted by sprivitor
Hi Folks.

With R1 on 2nd base, ball is hit to right field, R1 is forced completely out of base path (good 7 feet) because of obstructing F5 and F6, R1 rounds 3rd and on throw from F9, a close play at home has R1 tagged out.

It is clear that R1 would've made home safely had there been no obstruction. However, BU feels that obstruction only protects R1 to the "next" base. Doesn't obstruction protect the runner to the base they would've made had their been no obstruction? And from there, they're advancing at own risk?

Thanks
Let's just say if you'd been the umpire and in your judgement the runner would have made it home, then you blew the call. Gotta remember, it's all based on the ump's judgement. Your judgement may be different from theirs.
__________________
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2004, 11:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Don't confuse awarding the base the runner would have reached (ITUJ) with the guarantee of not being out between the bases where the OBS occurred.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2004, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 69
Cecilone,

I'm a bit confused by your message. After the game, we discussed this rule. The umpire was unsure that the player was protected going home because the obstruction did occur between 2nd and 3rd. However, he felt the player would have made it home had there been no obstruction between 2nd and 3rd.

So, how would you handle this situation?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2004, 12:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by sprivitor
However, he felt the player would have made it home had there been no obstruction between 2nd and 3rd.

So, how would you handle this situation?
If the umpire stated that his judgment was the runner would have made home, but he called her out anyway because he thought the rule only protected the runner to the "next" base, then this is a misinterpretation of the playing rules and may be protested.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2004, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally posted by sprivitor
Cecilone,
I'm a bit confused by your message. After the game, we discussed this rule. The umpire was unsure that the player was protected going home because the obstruction did occur between 2nd and 3rd. However, he felt the player would have made it home had there been no obstruction between 2nd and 3rd.
So, how would you handle this situation?
To add to what I said, there are two aspects of the effect of obstruction.

One is that the runner can not be putout in between the bases where the OBS occurred. That is, if runner was obstructed between 2nd and 3rd, the runner can not be put out between 2nd and 3rd. The runner could be put out between 3rd and home.

The other is that the obstructed runner will be awarded the base the umpire JUDGED the runner would have reached if there was no obstruction. This can get complicated, but in the simple case where the runner is apparently put out in a close play at a base, the runner should be awarded that base because the umpire JUDGED the runner would have reached that base if there was no obstruction.

That is , if a runner is obstructed between 2nd and 3rd, then "tagged out" in a close play at home; the runner shold be awarded home.

The above runner is also guaranteed not being put out between 2nd and 3rd, so if the runner falls down before 3rd and is tagged the runner is not out. The ball is then dead and the umpire awards the runner 3rd base if the umpire JUDGED the runner would have reached that base if there was no obstruction or 2nd if the umpired JUDGED otherwise.

In the above, "a close play" is determined by the runner being out by a margin equal to or less than the delay caused by the obstruction.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1