|
Fri May 28, 2004, 11:33am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe I'm tripping over the term "interference" and the statements concerning the runner "interferring" with a fielder's right to catch a thrown ball (which does not exist).
As it has been pointed out, the POE does not mention the "about to receive" when mentioning "crashing" into a fielder with the ball. I will agree that 8.7.Q would give you the out that I was relying on the Henry Pollard USC interp for the out, but that one being based on the USC, not the crash in particular. I intend to submit a rule change supporting HPs USC interpretation, but I do not know how that would affect the other rules being discussed in this thread.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
