Quote:
Originally posted by SamNVa
I don't completely agree eith the "no throw, no INT" philosophy. IMJ, if the batter moves in the bx and makes contact with the catcher, or causes the catcher to abort her throw in order to avoid contact with the batter. then an INT call is justified even without a throw.
SamC
|
Then try this one on for size. Last night during a meeting we were discussing some of the things we have seen this season in HS ball. Several umpires stated that they have seen batters square to bat on steal plays, especially on those where the runner is on 1B, and then bring the bat back with the pitch in line with the catcher's eyes. Is this act alone, in your opinion, enough to constitute interference?
Thu Apr 22, 2004, 12:28pm
Threaded Mode
