Quote:
Originally posted by SamNVa
I don't completely agree eith the "no throw, no INT" philosophy. IMJ, if the batter moves in the bx and makes contact with the catcher, or causes the catcher to abort her throw in order to avoid contact with the batter. then an INT call is justified even without a throw.
SamC
|
original post was "no play/no interference" .. a catcher trying to make a play is a play.