View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 22, 2004, 12:22pm
SamNVa SamNVa is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Send a message via ICQ to SamNVa Send a message via AIM to SamNVa Send a message via Yahoo to SamNVa
I don't completely agree with the "no throw, no INT" philosophy. IMJ, if the batter moves in the bx and makes contact with the catcher, or causes the catcher to abort her throw in order to avoid contact with the batter. then an INT call is justified even without a throw.

SamC

[Edited by SamNVa on Apr 22nd, 2004 at 01:28 PM]
Reply With Quote