The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 07:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Boy, how pathetic are we that the only active thread is one debating the closing of another?
Okay, I guess it is the slow time of the season and time for us to get out our imagination caps and come up with a couple of plays. Here's a "gimme":

R1 on first leaves the base at the time of the pitch, going off four giant steps (without saying "Mother may I".)

When the catcher receives the ball, R1 stays off the bag while F2 fakes the throw toward first several times. R1 just stands. F2 final throws the ball to F1 and R1 gradually starts dawdling back toward first.

Without quick pitching, F1 pitches the ball before R1 gets to first. BR hits the ball in the gap between F8 and F9. R1 never retouched first base and took off running at the time the ball was hit, ending up on third with the BR at second.

What's the call?
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 08:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
No pitch.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 10:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
No pitch, brace for the discussion.

The rule is ASA 6-10D.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 10:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Don't have the books handy, but why "No Pitch"? If there was no "quick pitch", don't you simply have the runner off base (which, depending on age / jurisdiction, could be an out - its an out here.)? Sounds like it was the dawdling that was the problem. The pitcher should not have to wait indefinitely for the slow batter to return to the base.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 10:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Send a message via ICQ to SamNVa Send a message via AIM to SamNVa Send a message via Yahoo to SamNVa
Mike,

The rule quoted (ASA 6-10-D Fastpitch) specifically states:

"No pitch shall be declared when the pitcher pitches before a runner has retouched her base after being legitimately off the base."

So as long as R1 is making a legitimate attempt to return to 1st, the pitcher has to wait.

SamC
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 10:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by SamNVa
So as long as R1 is making a legitimate attempt to return to 1st, the pitcher has to wait.
If she is dawdling too slow, I might just reach a judgment that she has stopped & ring her up for a look back violation.

But, in ASA at least, unless you call a LB violation, the pitcher must wait for the runner to return.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 06:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
And it does not say "how fast she must return", but
there are limits, or at least should be.

glen
__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 07:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally posted by SC Ump
Here's a "gimme"...
So maybe I lied and it's not a gimme.

NFHS (6-2-4) and NSA (6-8-c) both state that it is a "no pitch" if the runner has not retouched after a foul ball or dead ball. I was thinking that ASA's wording was for a foul ball, too, but I haven't looked at an ASA book for a few years.

In NFHS or NSA, I would have a "no call" in that no one did anything wrong.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 05, 2003, 07:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 517
Red face

Then you'd better look at 8-8-10 (Fed change for 2002)

Section is entitled "Runner is not out"
"Art.10...The runner is not given sufficient time to return to a base. The runner will not be called out for being off base before the pitcher releases the ball. EFFECT: "No Pitch" will be called by the umpire and the runner(s) will be permitted to return to the proper base(s) without penalty."


Roger Greene
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 06, 2003, 07:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally posted by Roger Greene
Then you'd better look at 8-8-10...

Roger Greene
Excellent. Thanks.

With that in mind, I reviewed NSA again and found 8-9-h that said pretty much the exact same thing.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 06, 2003, 05:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Define "sufficient time" in light of the fact that the runner was dawdling (meaning, to me, taking MORE than the necessary or "sufficient" time to get back to the base.) From the description of the play, the player was given "sufficient time" to get back, but failed to do so because of inactivity on her own part.

If you rule this one a no pitch, what if you extend it. Runner is halfway to 2nd, but begins returning to the base when the pitcher looks at her. She goes amazingly slowly, but does not waver in her consistent direction toward first. Do you have the pitcher waiting 1 minute, 2 minutes before the runner finally gets back?

Again - define "sufficient" in the context of this situation. Sounds "sufficient" to me.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 06, 2003, 08:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Sufficient is the length of time it takes at the speed the runner is moving. It's distracting, awkward, not normal play, etc. but the rule as it stands. If you think it's a travesty or unsporting, call it.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1