|
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 10:36am
|
|||
|
|||
|
another exam wording
Did you see the question about possible INT by BR, worded as what does NOT apply? Someone read it to me by phone, so I do not have a copy yet.
Choices partially worded for id are: BR stopped BR one foot out of lane BR avoided fielder All of the above
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. 
|
|
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 02:46pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I searched USASB and NFHS exams and couldn't find anything like that.
Another sanction, perhaps?
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball
|
|
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 02:51pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
It was NFHS Part 2. I will get to it tomorrow, I hope.
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| looking for wording | Tru_in_Blu | Softball | 22 | Mon Jul 15, 2019 11:01am |
| Inappropriate Wording | Chess Ref | Softball | 20 | Tue Jul 14, 2009 04:54pm |
| 9-9-2 wording change | Nevadaref | Basketball | 2 | Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:08am |
| Screwy wording | SamNVa | Softball | 17 | Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:05am |
Linear Mode
